Use of Normal Saline Instillation with Suctioning: The Debate Continues
Use of Normal Saline Instillation with Suctioning: The Debate Continues
Abstract & Commentary
By Ruth Kleinpell, PhD, RN, Director, Center for Clinical Research and Scholarship, Rush University Medical Center; Professor, Rush University College of Nursing, Chicago, is Associate Editor for Critical Care Alert.
Dr. Kleinpell reports no financial relationship to this field of study.
Synopsis: This randomized clinical trial compared 130 mechanically ventilated patients who received 8 mL instillation of isotonic saline before tracheal suctioning to a control group of 132 patients who did not in a medical surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in an oncology hospital and found a decrease in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in the saline instillation group. No differences were found in the incidence of atelectasis on daily chest radiography and endotracheal tube occlusions.
Source: Caruso P, et al. Saline instillation before tracheal suctioning decreases the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2009;37:32-38.
The use of normal saline instillation with suctioning has been debated over the years due to uncertainty about the benefits of use. Caruso and colleagues assessed the use of the instillation of 8 mL of saline before tracheal suctioning and compared VAP rates among control and treatment patients receiving mechanical ventilation for > 72 hours who had an orotracheal or tracheo-tomy tube. VAP rates diagnosed based on clinical suspicion and confirmed by bronchoalveolar lavage quantitative culture were compared between the groups. The rate of clinically suspected VAP was similar in both groups, while the incidence of microbiologically proven VAP was significantly lower in the saline group (P = 0.008).
Commentary
The instillation of normal saline prior to endotracheal suctioning was acknowledged as a common clinical practice several decades ago. However, research over the past 2 decades has demonstrated adverse physiological effects with the use of normal saline instillation including decreases in oxygen saturation and desaturation,1-9 increased heart rate,3,6,8 risk of infection due to dislodgement of bacterial colonies,10 and subjective patient reports of pain, anxiety, and dyspnea.11,12 As a result of the evidence from a number of research studies, the routine use of normal saline instillation with suctioning has not been a recommended practice for mechanically ventilated patients. A recent clinical evidence review identified that collectively the research studies examining normal saline instillation provided class III evidence of adverse physiological and psychological effects and support against the routine use of normal saline with suctioning.13
The findings by Caruso and colleagues demonstrated lower rates of VAP found in those patients randomized to normal saline instillation before suctioning. These results are contrary to the research evidence that demonstrated a variety of adverse effects of saline instillation with suctioning. However, the results of the study must be interpreted with caution due to a number of limitations, including the use of an oncology population that differs from general ICU patients in terms of incidence of VAP, antibiotic pretreatment, immunosuppression, and mortality rates.14 Additionally, independent variables with clinical relevance, including antibiotic treatment in the groups, immunosuppression, and age, were excluded as confounding factors.14 It is also unclear as to whether the researchers controlled for other standard interventions to avoid VAP such as oral care, aspiration of subglottic secretions, and maintenance of cuff pressure on the endotracheal tube.13 While the results of the study by Caruso and colleagues did demonstrate decreased rates of VAP in those patients randomized to receive normal saline instillation prior to suctioning, it is evident that additional research is needed before this practice is recommended for routine use in ICU patients, especially as the research evidence base had not supported continuation of this practice.
References
- Bostick J, Wendelgass S. Normal saline instillation as part of the suctioning procedure: Effects of PaO2 and amount of secretions. Heart Lung 1987:16:532-537.
- Ackerman M, Gugerty B. The effect of normal saline bolus instillation in artificial airways. J Soc Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Nurses 1990;8:14-17.
- Gray J, et al. The effects of bolus normal-saline instillation in conjunction with endotracheal suctioning. Respir Care 1990;35:785-790.
- Reynolds P, et al. Effects of normal saline instillation on secretion volume, dynamic compliance and oxygen saturation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141:A574
- Ackerman M. The effect of saline lavage prior to suctioning. Am J Crit Care 1993;2:326-330.
- Ackerman M, Mick D. Instillation of normal saline before suctioning in patients with pulmonary infection: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Am J Crit Care 1998;7:216-266.
- Kinloch D, et al. Instillation of normal saline during endotracheal suctioning: Effects on mixed venous oxygen saturation. Am J Crit Care 1999;8:231-242.
- Akgul S, Akyolcu N. Effects of normal saline on endotracheal suctioning. J Clin Nurse 2002;11:826-830.
- Ji Y, et al. Instillation of normal saline before suctioning in patients with pneumonia. Yonsei Med J 2002;43:607-612.
- Hagler D, Traver G. Endotracheal saline and suction catheters: Sources of lower airway contamination. Am J Crit Care 1994;3:444-447.
- Jablonski R. The experience of being mechanically ventilated. Qual Health Res 1994;4:186-207.
- O'Neal P, et al. Level of dyspnea experienced in mechanically ventilated adults with and without saline instillation prior to endotracheal suctioning. Intensive Crit Care Nurse 2001;17:356-363.
- Halm MA, Krisko-Hagel K. Instilling normal saline with suctioning: Beneficial technique or potentially harmful sacred cow? Am J Crit Care 2008;17:469-472.
- Deja M, Spies C. Prevention measures of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2009;37:330-332.
Subscribe Now for Access
You have reached your article limit for the month. We hope you found our articles both enjoyable and insightful. For information on new subscriptions, product trials, alternative billing arrangements or group and site discounts please call 800-688-2421. We look forward to having you as a long-term member of the Relias Media community.