Relias Media - Continuing Medical Education Publishing

The trusted source for

healthcare information and

CONTINUING EDUCATION.

  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • MyAHC
    • Home
      • Home
      • Newsletters
      • Blogs
      • Archives
      • CME/CE Map
      • Shop
    • Emergency
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Webinars
      • Group Sales
    • Hospital
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Webinars
      • Group Sales
    • Clinical
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Webinars
      • Group Sales
    • All Access
      • Subscribe Now
      • My Subscription
    • My Account
      • My Subscriptions
      • My Content
      • My Orders
      • My CME/CE
      • My Transcript
    Home » Both sides need IT expert to explain EMR charting

    Both sides need IT expert to explain EMR charting

    July 1, 2014
    No Comments
    Reprints
    Facebook Twitter Linkedin Share Share

    Related Articles

    Bilateral Pleural Effusions: Do Both Sides Need to be Tapped?

    Bilateral Pleural Effusions: Do Both Sides Need to be Tapped?

    Should RNs administer propofol? Providers stand on both sides of issue

    Requests for metadata are increasing the cost of malpractice litigation, because it requires that attorneys invest time and money to determine its meaning.

    "Once the defense presents the metadata, it’s not going to necessarily be in English. You need somebody to decipher it," says Thomas R. McLean, MD, JD, CEO of American Medical Litigation Support Services, a Shawnee, KS-based firm that provides attorneys with litigation support.

    Attorneys are increasingly hiring information technology (IT) experts to help with this. "On the defense side, once you receive notice that something is going to be litigated, then you have an obligation to preserve the evidence," says McLean. One question is how much of the metadata in the patient’s medical record has to be preserved. "Theoretically, it’s all of it," says McLean. "But this could be viewed as unduly burdensome. These are questions that have to be worked out down the line."

    Defense lawyers might need to hire an IT expert to decipher what the metadata shows. Michelle M. Garzon, JD, an attorney at Williams Kastner in Tacoma, WA, says, "I can’t keep it back from the plaintiff, but I sure want to know what it’s saying before I turn it over."

    Even the wording used for discovery requests varies depending on the EMR system used by the physician practice or hospital. "There is a learning curve on how to request it, how to get it, and how to determine if it exists," says McLean. "You might have to depose the IT guy to get at this stuff. The Cerner data might not be the same as the Epic data or the VA’s EMR."

    IT experts can help the plaintiff to prepare discovery questions and interpret what is received in discovery, and in some cases, might even testify in court.

    In this case, says McLean, "you will need a highly articulate IT person. Otherwise, a good defense attorney is going to show that the person is confused and doesn’t know what they are talking about."

    Suspicions are raised

    EMRs give the defense the added job of explaining to a jury why the printout they’re viewing appears very different from what the provider viewed onscreen while caring for the patient.

    "We have been trying to get a beta version from the EMR vendors to use in depositions, because it looks so different in the printout than it does to the providers," says Garzon.

    A one-week admission might produce 1,000 pages with a lot of duplication. "Sometimes you can print it out one day, and if you print it out again the next week, it looks different," says Garzon. "That raises suspicions."

    The plaintiff might have obtained EMR charting in a particular way in a previous case, but the information isn’t available in the same way for a subsequent case because the defendant uses a different EMR. "This requires an explanation of how the system works," says Garzon, "Otherwise, they think you are hiding something."

    Post a comment to this article

    Report Abusive Comment

    Physician Risk Management

    View PDF
    Physician Risk Management 2014-07-01
    July 1, 2014

    Table Of Contents

    Time-stamped EMR entries turn cases from defensible to candidates for settlement

    Prevent claims alleging failure to follow up on abnormal test results

    Use EMRs to document follow up with patients

    Find out what the EMR does in response to plaintiff discovery request

    Data integrity failures in EMRs is No. 1 concern

    Inaccurate EMR charting can complicate the defense

    These EMR shortcuts are legally risky for MDs — Workarounds can complicate defense

    Both sides need IT expert to explain EMR charting

    Plaintiff attorneys doing more e-discovery, but it’s not always fruitful

    Sunshine Act reporting has implications for malpractice litigation

    Will apology cause patient to sue? Perception is ‘outdated and inaccurate’

    Man with spinal injuries commits suicide — $2.88 million verdict given

    Woman receives $14 million verdict in Yasmin prescription case

    Shop Now: Search Products

    • Subscription Publications
    • Books & Study Guides
    • Webinars
    • Group & Site
      Licenses
    • State CME/CE
      Requirements

    Webinars And Events

    View All Events
    • Home
      • Home
      • Newsletters
      • Blogs
      • Archives
      • CME/CE Map
      • Shop
    • Emergency
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Webinars
      • Group Sales
    • Hospital
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Webinars
      • Group Sales
    • Clinical
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Webinars
      • Group Sales
    • All Access
      • Subscribe Now
      • My Subscription
    • My Account
      • My Subscriptions
      • My Content
      • My Orders
      • My CME/CE
      • My Transcript
    • Help
    • Search
    • About Us
    • Sign In
    • Register
    Relias Media - Continuing Medical Education Publishing

    The trusted source for

    healthcare information and

    CONTINUING EDUCATION.

    Customer Service

    customerservice@reliasmedia.com

    U.S. and Canada: 1-800-688-2421

    International +1-404-262-5476

    Accounts Receivable

    1-800-370-9210
    ReliasMedia_AR@reliasmedia.com

    Mailing Address

    • 1010 Sync St., Suite 100
      Morrisville, NC 27560-5468
      USA

    © 2021 Relias. All rights reserved.

    Do Not Sell My Personal Information  Privacy Policy  Terms of Use  Contact Us  Reprints  Group Sales

    For DSR inquiries or complaints, please reach out to Wes Vaux, Data Privacy Officer, DPO@relias.com

    Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing