By Louis Kuritzky, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Florida, Gainesville. Dr. Kuritzky is an advisor for Endo, Kowa, Pricara, and Takeda.
Functional Cobalamin Deficiency in Diabetes
Source: Solomon LR. Diabetes Care 2011;34:1077-1080.
It has been suggested that as many as 30% of senior citizens have so-called functional cobalamin deficiency (FCD), defined as the presence of elevated metabolites such as methylmalonic acid in the face of ostensibly normal cobalamin levels. Since methylmalonic acid should accumulate primarily in the circumstance of vitamin B12 insufficiency, there appears to be some functional deficiency in cobalamin, manifested as increased levels of methylmalonic acid.
The intersection of diabetes with FCD occurs because previous trials have noted that diabetics comprise up to one-third of subjects experiencing improvements in neuropathic signs with vitamin B12 supplementation, and the vast majority of these subjects (88%) did not have decreased vitamin B12 levels.
To better define the epidemiologic profile of FCD, a retrospective review of patients evaluated for cobalamin deficiency from 1993-2005 characterized levels of cobalamin in relation to methylmalonic acid. Because renal insufficiency is associated with increases in methylmalonic acid, creatinine > 1.4 mg/dL was an exclusion criterion.
Among nondiabetics there was an inverse relationship between methylmalonic acid and cobalamin. Among diabetics, however, increasing cobalamin levels were not associated with decreasing methylmalonic acid, suggesting that there was a relative cobalamin resistance.
Equally noteworthy, neuropathy was much more frequent in persons with elevated methylmalonic acid than without (62% vs 18%) and more than 85% of persons treated with pharmacologic doses of cobalamin experienced improvement in neuropathy.
There is substantial controversy over the existence of functional cobalamin deficiency. Considering that cobalamin supplementation has no known important toxicity, clinicians may wish to re-examine the issue of cobalamin treatment for diabetic subjects with elevated levels of methylmalonic acid, even in the face of normal cobalamin levels.
Should Leukotriene Antagonists Have Higher Priority for Asthma Control?
Source: Price D, et al. N Eng J Med 2011;364:1695-1707.
Current asthma guidelines suggest that once an asthma patient has progressed to the stage of persistent asthma (even mild-persistent asthma), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) should be the preferred initial "controller" (maintenance) medication. Nonetheless, comparator trials of leukotriene inhibitors (LKT) with ICS have produced inconsistent findings, sometimes indicating superiority of ICS, but other times suggesting equal efficacy of the two classes. Because concerns about adverse effects of ICS in obstructive airways diseases have persisted for several decades, the absence of similar concerns with LKT agents promotes consideration of how to maximize their positive potential.
Two trials comprise the data reported in this publication. In the first, persons initiating controller therapy for persistent asthma (n = 306) were randomized to either ICS or LKT. In the second trial, asthma subjects who had already received ICS for controller medication but who required advancement of pharmacotherapy (n = 352) were randomized to either LKT or long-acting beta agonist (LABA). The primary outcome was the score on the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire at 2 months. Secondary outcomes included the same questionnaire results at 2 years and frequency of asthma exacerbations.
At 2 months, the LKT proved equivalent to ICS as initial therapy, and equivalent to LABA as add-on treatment. At 2 years, although not able to achieve the statistical threshold defining equivalence, the outcomes were very similar. There was no difference in the frequency of exacerbations between LKT and ICS or between LKT and LABA when added to ICS. There was no placebo control in this trial, and the trial was open label. Nevertheless, these data suggest that in a "real world" setting, the efficacy of LKT in asthma may have been underestimated.
Selenium Impacts Orbitopathy in Graves Disease
Source: Krassas GE, et al. N Eng J Med 2011;364:1920-1931.
Ocular abnormalities associated with Graves disease are sometimes called Graves' orbitopathy (GORB) and occur in as many as half of Graves' disease cases. Treatments for GORB include glucocorticoids and irradiation, but are generally reserved for moderately severe disease. Mild GORB has been shown to spontaneously regress (20%), remain stable/unchanging (65%), or advance (15%). Hence, a safe intervention to prevent advancement of GORB would be desirable. The antioxidant effects of selenium led to consideration of its potential favorable impact upon GORB.
This controlled trial randomized patients (n = 107) to selenium sulfide 100 mcg twice daily or placebo for 6 months. GORB evaluation was done at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients improving from baseline. The study hypothesis was that active treatment would improve the number of persons with GORB regression by 25%: from 20% (as seen in naturalistic follow-up of untreated GORB) to 45%.
By 6 months, there was a statistically significant improved quality of life and regression of GORB, which was reconfirmed at 12 months. There were no serious adverse effects seen with selenium.
Although it would have been nice to have seen selenium levels before and after treatment, and hopefully a correlation between selenium repletion and outcomes, these preliminary data are still quite supportive of a role for selenium in early GORB.