Relias Media - Continuing Medical Education Publishing

The trusted source for

healthcare information and

CONTINUING EDUCATION.

  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • MyAHC
    • Home
      • Home
      • Newsletters
      • Blogs
      • Archives
      • CME/CE Map
      • Shop
    • Emergency
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Webinars
      • Group Sales
    • Hospital
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Webinars
      • Group Sales
    • Clinical
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Webinars
      • Group Sales
    • All Access
      • Subscribe Now
      • My Subscription
    • My Account
      • My Subscriptions
      • My Content
      • My Orders
      • My CME/CE
      • My Transcript
    Home » ‘Why the Foley?’ Initiative Grabs Attention, Prevents CAUTIs

    ‘Why the Foley?’ Initiative Grabs Attention, Prevents CAUTIs

    ‘We wanted people to think about this, and it worked’

    October 1, 2018
    No Comments
    Reprints
    Facebook Twitter Linkedin Share Share

    Related Articles

    SARS: Why should home health pay attention?

    Personal health info is up for grabs

    New Jersey hospital pushing CAUTIs to zero

    Related Products

    SARS: Why should home health pay attention? | Single Article

    CDC progress report shows HAI reductions C. diff, CAUTIs the notable exceptions | Single Article

    Reports from the Field: Therapy prevents platelet depletion in hep C patients | Single Article

    Not everyone was pleased with the provocative acronym, but an infection preventionist’s “Why the Foley?” campaign captured attention and dramatically reduced catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs).

    Cassandra Mueller, MSN, RN, CNL, an IP at Boone Hospital Center in Columbia, MO, described the findings recently in Minneapolis at the annual conference of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology.

    “Most of the UTIs in the hospital are caused by a Foley catheter,” she said.

    “Prolonged use of a urinary catheter is the most important risk for developing a UTI, and for every day a patient has a catheter the risk increases.”

    CAUTI prolongs the patient length of stay, adding about 2.5 days before discharge. The average increased cost is about $800 a patient, she said.

    Mueller reminded attendees that while once considered benign or nuisance infections, CAUTIs have a 2% mortality rate, with approximately 13,000 patient deaths annually.

    CAUTIs increased at Boone Hospital in 2015, resulting in “financial penalties across multiple pay-for-performance programs,” she said.

    A CAUTI Task Force was formed that included IPs, quality, leadership, nurses, and physicians. The goal was to reduce the CAUTI rate through a series of interventions.

    Interventions

    The first step was conducting a hospitalwide assessment of urinary catheter insertion and maintenance, she said. A common finding was some break in the insertion process, usually due to a failure to maintain aseptic technique.

    To address these problems and standardize the process, a checklist was created for catheter insertion, which one nurse checked down while another was inserting the catheter.

    “When a nurse was inserting a catheter, another nurse was in the room with them and following a standardized checklist,” Mueller said.

    “That was to make sure no one missed a step during insertion. We kind of held everybody accountable.”

    Likewise, infection preventionists became involved in the training of new nurses. “Another IP and I went to the nurse preceptor and the nurse resident classes and did hands-on catheter insertion and maintenance training,” she says.

    The IPs also participated in multidisciplinary rounds in the ICU to raise awareness of the CAUTI prevention program. The WTF term was rolled out, encouraging staff, through posters and messaging from a task force, to daily question the need for a Foley.

    “Not everyone embraced the WTF concept — I can’t imagine why,” Mueller said. “But it got their attention.”

    For example, Mueller sent out email updates on the campaign, putting “WTF” in the subject line in communications that included hospital administration.

    “People were like, ‘what?’ she said. “But they paid attention to my emails, and that’s what we wanted. We wanted people to think about this, and it worked. We called it ‘WTF’ to get attention.”

    Patient brochures on preventing CAUTIs were included in all admissions packages. There were activities to promote compliance, including a reward system for appropriate removal of a catheter.

    “They would call me every time they took one out,” Mueller said. “I confirmed it was documented and then they would get a ticket. When they got four tickets, they got a gift card.”

    An 80% Drop

    As the program set in, positive results followed, including four months without a CAUTI at one point.

    That called for a celebration, so Mueller’s team ordered 450 cookies, telling the baker to put “WTF” on every one of them. Thinking that must be a mistake, the bakery put “WTS” on the cookies instead.

    “We thought it was funny when we went to pick them up,” she said. “But the bakery scraped off the ‘S’ and put the ‘F’ on the cookies. The staff got a kick out of that and loved the cookies.”

    In another attention-grabber that drew some strange looks, Mueller and colleagues made hanging art “mobiles” out of bed pans and urinals and hung them from the ceiling in a physician dining area.

    “All of these were things we did to promote catheter utilization and CAUTI prevention,” Mueller said.

    As a result, the Standardized Infection Ratio for CAUTI fell by 80% from the preimplementation period (January 2016 - September 2016) to the postimplementation (October 2016 - September 2017).

    In the category of obstacles and lessons learned, nurses were hesitant to remove catheters without alerting physicians, Mueller said. They were empowered to do so if the Foley met certain criteria, but that aspect remains a work in progress.

    “That wasn’t new,” she said. “Nurses sometime just don’t feel comfortable taking out the catheter without asking the physicians. This is a constant hurdle we are trying to overcome. It was difficult to change established beliefs and behaviors.”

    Some experienced NICU nurses balked at the requirement to have an observer present when inserting a catheter.

    “I get it — I’m a nurse,” Mueller said. “They said, ‘We know how to put in a catheter; we don’t need someone watching us.’ We just tried to reiterate that it was because we want to standardize how we do it. It’s not that you don’t know how to do it.”

    Post a comment to this article

    Report Abusive Comment

    www.reliasmedia.com

    Hospital Infection Control & Prevention

    View PDF
    Hospital Infection Control & Prevention (Vol. 45, No. 10) - October 2018
    October 1, 2018

    Table Of Contents

    Outcasts: HAIs Stigmatize Discharged Patients

    Staffing Woes: IP-Hospital Beds Ratio Outdated

    SHEA: Avoid Routine Testing for C. diff in the NICU

    ‘Why the Foley?’ Initiative Grabs Attention, Prevents CAUTIs

    Joint Commission Revises IC Devices Standard

    FDA Adds New Safety Warning for Fluoroquinolones

    CDC: New Flu Vaccine Ready After Harsh 2017-2018 Season

    EMTs Treating Opioid Patients Succumb to Illness

    Begin Test

    Buy this Issue/Course

    Financial Disclosure: Peer Reviewer Patrick Joseph, MD, reports that he is a consultant for Genomic Health Reference Laboratory, Siemens Clinical Laboratory, and CareDx Clinical Laboratory. Senior Writer Gary Evans, Editor Jesse Saffron, Editor Jill Drachenberg, Nurse Planner Patti Grant, RN, BSN, MS, CIC, and Editorial Group Manager Terrey L. Hatcher report no consultant, stockholder, speaker’s bureau, research, or other financial relationships with companies having ties to this field of study.

    Shop Now: Search Products

    • Subscription Publications
    • Books & Study Guides
    • Webinars
    • Group & Site
      Licenses
    • State CME/CE
      Requirements

    Webinars And Events

    View All Events
    • Home
      • Home
      • Newsletters
      • Blogs
      • Archives
      • CME/CE Map
      • Shop
    • Emergency
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Webinars
      • Group Sales
    • Hospital
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Webinars
      • Group Sales
    • Clinical
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Webinars
      • Group Sales
    • All Access
      • Subscribe Now
      • My Subscription
    • My Account
      • My Subscriptions
      • My Content
      • My Orders
      • My CME/CE
      • My Transcript
    • Help
    • Search
    • About Us
    • Sign In
    • Register
    Relias Media - Continuing Medical Education Publishing

    The trusted source for

    healthcare information and

    CONTINUING EDUCATION.

    Customer Service

    customerservice@reliasmedia.com

    U.S. and Canada: 1-800-688-2421

    International +1-404-262-5476

    Accounts Receivable

    1-800-370-9210
    ReliasMedia_AR@reliasmedia.com

    Mailing Address

    • 1010 Sync St., Suite 100
      Morrisville, NC 27560-5468
      USA

    © 2021 Relias. All rights reserved.

    Do Not Sell My Personal Information  Privacy Policy  Terms of Use  Contact Us  Reprints  Group Sales

    For DSR inquiries or complaints, please reach out to Wes Vaux, Data Privacy Officer, DPO@relias.com

    Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing