After Ischemic Stroke Related to Atrial Fibrillation, Direct Oral Anticoagulants Are Superior to Vitamin K Antagonists
By Matthew M. Fink, MD
Louis and Gertrude Feil Professor and Chair, Department of Neurology, Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, NYP/Weill Cornell Medical College
Dr. Fink reports no financial relationships relevant to this field of study.
SOURCE: Seiffge DJ, Paciaroni M, Wilson D, et al. Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists after recent ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Neurol 2019;85:823-834.
Oral anticoagulation is effective in preventing ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. For many years, vitamin K antagonists were the only oral agents available, but there are now several direct oral anticoagulants, including the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban. Direct oral anticoagulants have demonstrated at least as much efficacy as warfarin, with a lower risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. However, investigators of these medications have allowed long delays following acute ischemic stroke before the medications were started. Seiffge et al investigated the benefits and risks of early anticoagulation following acute ischemic stroke, and compared the effects of direct oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin K antagonists.
The investigators performed a meta-analysis by analyzing individual patient data from seven prospective cohort studies. Patients were included if they presented with atrial fibrillation and a recent cerebral infarct less than three months before starting oral anticoagulation, with a minimum follow-up of three months. They analyzed the association between the type of anticoagulation, direct oral anticoagulant vs. vitamin K antagonist, with the primary composite endpoint of recurrent ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or mortality, using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.
The investigators included 4,912 patients, with a median age of 78 years, 47.5% women, and median National Institutes of Health stroke scale score of 5, with 45.9% of patients receiving vitamin K antagonist and 54.1% of patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants. The median time from the ischemic event to starting medication was five days for all medications. In follow-up, there were 262 acute ischemic strokes, for a rate of 4.4% per year; 71 intracranial hemorrhages, for a rate of 1.2% per year; and 439 deaths, or 7.4% every year during a follow-up of 5,970 patient-years. Compared to vitamin K antagonists, the direct oral anticoagulation treatment was associated with a reduced risk for the composite endpoint (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; P < 0.05) as well as a reduced intracerebral hemorrhage rate (HR, 0.42; P < 0.01). There was no difference between the two drug categories related to the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke or mortality. Overall, treatment with direct oral anticoagulants resulted in a reduced risk of experiencing poor clinical outcomes, primarily because of a lower risk of suffering an intracerebral hemorrhage.
Researchers investigated the benefits and risks of early anticoagulation following acute ischemic stroke, and compared the effects of direct oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin K antagonists.
Subscribe Now for Access
You have reached your article limit for the month. We hope you found our articles both enjoyable and insightful. For information on new subscriptions, product trials, alternative billing arrangements or group and site discounts please call 800-688-2421. We look forward to having you as a long-term member of the Relias Media community.