Don’t be the fall guy: Investigate every accident and find ways to prevent them

Respond quickly and thoroughly to falls and near misses

You’re busy with a dozen other issues when you get a phone call notifying you that a visitor has fallen in the lobby and broken her arm. Do you chalk it up to "just another fall" and get back to work, or do you spring into action?

The answer may depend on how well you’ve prepared for the moment, and how seriously you take slips and falls in your institution. The experts say that if you’re taking the right steps to reduce falls and all the attending liability, you’ll probably get up from your desk and make investigating the incident your top priority for the day.

A speedy response and full-scale investigation may not be necessary for every incident. But the more serious the fall, the more you should pull out all the stops in your response. A serious injury such as a broken arm is enough to justify a full response, says Ronald Miller, CSP, director of training and consulting services for the occupational safety and health group of the National Safety Council in Itasca, IL.

"Most employers handle this rather poorly," he says. "Most of the companies I’ve worked with needed extensive training on how to do a good investigation. If a health care provider wants to reduce falls, you need to take a hard look at what happens when someone falls."

There could be a tough decision to make in some circumstances, though — if you document the incident well enough to learn from it, will you create ammunition for a plaintiff’s attorney?

Investigate every fall, sometimes with a team

The risk manager should take the lead in ensuring that all falls, and most near misses, are investigated thoroughly, Miller says. Sometimes, the local supervisor can be trusted to conduct the investigation and document the incident, but sometimes the seriousness of the fall can require a multidisciplinary team approach. That team may include the risk manager, director of safety, the facility’s head engineer, the director of housekeeping, and the manager of the unit where the incident happened.

Whether a team or an individual investigates the fall, a quick response is vital, Miller says. Employees, especially managers, should be educated about the need to preserve evidence and investigate after falls. For serious incidents, they should be trained to call the risk management department immediately so that a full-scale investigation can commence.

"Incident investigations should be done immediately because conditions change," he says. "If there is a hazard on the floor like a spilled liquid or bodily fluid, someone is going to clean it up quickly, especially after there is an incident. Unless the investigation is done quickly, you may never find that root cause. The cause could be a motorized equipment cart with an oil leak; and if the spill has been cleaned up and no one remembers leakage from that cart, you may never find it."

Many providers avoid documenting falls

Not only do many health care providers not adequately investigate falls, many willfully avoid documenting the incidents for fear of creating evidence that can be used against them in court, says Russell J. Kendzior, CSP, president of the nonprofit National Floor Safety Institute and Traction Plus, a manufacturer of slip-and-fall prevention products, both in Southlake, TX. Kendzior often testifies as an expert witness for slip-and-fall cases, and says health care staff often are conspicuously unable to show documentation of the incidents.

The problem is especially bad in nursing homes, where the risk and potential liability from falls is the greatest, he says.

"One unfortunate reality in health care is that they often have been trained by risk managers, loss-control experts, and third-party claims managers to be very vague in gathering information," he says. "They will say you don’t want to collect or track certain information because it can only come back to haunt you in court. I know that sounds crazy, but I see it a lot."

Some health care providers even choose not to have a policy on the prevention of slips and falls, for fear that a plaintiff’s attorney will use it to prove that the facility was not following its own policy. Kendzior says is a very poor strategy if you’re trying to reduce falls, which he calls "by far the biggest risk your patients face while they’re in your care."

Responding properly to a fall is important, but Kendzior says a proactive program is even more effective. The risk manager should work closely with the engineering and housekeeping departments to ensure that floors are maintained in such as way as to minimize the risk of falls, he says. And the proper maintenance of floors is more complicated than you might think; "clean" is not simple to define.

When you investigate a fall, Miller says you should gather as much information as possible about the area and the activity leading to the fall. Document the information and consider photographing pertinent scenes, especially those that may mitigate the institution’s liability for the fall. Investigators often photograph the area in which the person fell and maybe even the fluid spill that caused it, but they sometimes overlook documenting the precautions that mitigate the damages. For instance, you may wish to photograph the "wet-floor" sign that housekeeping had in place to warn people, or the handrails that helped the person avoid a more serious fall.

Miller suggests that risk managers should draw on a skill they employ for other investigations — the root-cause analysis (RCA). The incident investigation after a serious fall should follow the same methodology and strive for the same goals as a RCA after an adverse medical event, he says. The goal should be to uncover the real cause of the fall, not just the defect that appears most obvious.

Just as with less-than-optimal investigations of medical incidents, a common failing of fall analyses is blaming the employee who fell or who made the fall possible by leaving a hazard on the floor, Miller says. That is rarely the root cause.

"Most reports by a supervisor will conclude that the way to fix the problem is to retrain the employee, but you’ll never see one that says retrain the supervisor. Few people condemn themselves," he says. "If you don’t focus on the root-cause analysis, you’ll stop before you find the real problem."

Punishing employees or laying all the blame on them also will discourage the free reporting that is so important for good fall investigations, he says. If your employees only report the ones they have to report — the falls that leave someone lying on the floor needing medical help — you’ll miss the opportunity to learn.

When investigating and analyzing the data, Miller says you should focus on these four areas that lead to most slips and falls:

  • Equipment: Check to see if any items were defective, such as handrails that did not support the person or anything that could have led to tripping.
  • Environment: This area includes all types of hazardous conditions, such as the condition of stairs and floors. Was there blood or other fluid on the floor? Why? How long had it been there?
  • Management: Ascertain whether there was a breakdown in management, such as allowing employees to run through the department. Was management condoning it or even encouraging it?
  • People: Who fell? Was the person impaired in any way? What was he or she doing at the time of the fall? Also consider the type and condition of the person’s shoes.

Miller says most falls can be traced to failures in at least three of those categories.

"And remember that you have to do something with the data," he says. "If you don’t use it to improve, you’re just wasting your time and opening yourself up for more incidents."


Visit HRM, ED Legal Letter site

We now offer free on-line access to www.hrmnewsletter.com for Hospital Risk Management subscribers. The site features current and back issues of HRM and ED Legal Letter, also from Thomson American Health Consultants.

Included on the site and in its archives are links to every article published in HRM’s Legal Review & Commentary supplement from January 1999 to present.

There also are links to every article published in Healthcare Risk Management’s Patient Safety Quarterly and Patient Safety Alert supplements from January 1999 to present.

HRM’s 2001 salary survey also is available in its entirety.

Find links to other web sites that are essential references for risk managers. There also is a guide to upcoming conferences and events of interest to risk managers. Click on the User Login icon for instructions on accessing this site.