Sports Medicine in Primary Care
Manish Mannan, MD, Fellow, Wright State University/Kettering Sports Medicine, Integrated Fellowship in Sports Medicine, Dayton, OH
James Tytko, MD, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Family Medicine and Department of Emergency Medicine Program Director, Wright State University/Kettering Sports Medicine Integrated Fellowship in Sports Medicine, Dayton, OH
Christopher J. Haines, DO, FAAP, FACEP, Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Drexel University College of Medicine; Director, Department of Emergency Medicine and Medical Director, Critical Care Transport Team, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA
The benefits of regular physical activity are well known. Encouraging individuals to be active through recreational and competitive athletics while preventing and treating injuries is the role of the sports medicine physician. Participation in organized sports is increasing. More than 7.6 million high school students participated in high school sports in 2010-2011, compared with an estimated 4 million in 1971-1972.1 With this, the field of sports medicine is also rapidly advancing. This review will discuss new methods to prevent injuries, further understanding of concussions, the use of platelet rich plasma and prolotherapy to accelerate healing, and the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound to evaluate soft tissue injuries and aid in injections.
Physical Activity Among Americans
Physical activity can improve the health and quality of life of Americans of all ages, regardless of the presence of chronic disease and disability. Physical activity among adults can lower the risk of:
- Early death
- Coronary heart disease
- High blood pressure
- Type 2 diabetes
- Breast and colon cancer
Among children and adolescents, physical activity can:
- Improve bone health
- Improve cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness
- Decrease levels of body fat
- Reduce symptoms of depression.2,3
In 1995, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) published physical activity recommendations for public health. The report stated that adults should accumulate at least 30 minutes a day of moderate-intensity physical activity on most, and preferably all, days per week. To track the percentage of adults who meet this guideline, CDC specified that "most" days per week was 5 days. Since 1995, the common recommendation has been that the adults obtain at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity on 5 or more days a week, for a total of at least 150 minutes a week. The 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (PAG) are the first government-published national guidelines for physical activity. PAG reaffirmed the CDC/ACSM recommendations. However, according to the advisory committee report, existing scientific evidence does not allow researchers to say whether the health benefits of 30 minutes of activity on 5 days a week are different from health benefits of 50 minutes of activity on 3 days a week.3 As a result, new guidelines allow a person to accumulate 150 minutes a week in various ways. Children should do 60 minutes or more physical activity daily. As a part of their daily physical activity, children and adolescents should include muscle-strengthening activities at least 3 days a week and bone-strengthening physical activity at least 3 days a week.3
Unfortunately, more than 80% of adults do not meet the guidelines for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities. More than 80% of youths do not do enough aerobic physical activity to meet the guidelines for youths. The estimated annual health care cost associated with obesity is about $209 billion4 and an additional $183 billion is spent on heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and arthritis.2
Acute Injuries in Sports Medicine
Although a significant number of American adults and youth do not meet the recommendations set by PAG in general population, there has been a steady increase in sports and recreational activity over the last decade. In the United States, sports has evolved into a major component of everyday life. American youth are involved in scholastic, club, collegiate, and recreational sports. In addition to the 7.6 million students who participate in high school sports annually,1 more than 30 million athletes participate in club and recreational sports.5-6 In fact, every fifth unintentional injury in typical communities in industrialized parts of the world is associated with sports and physical exercise.7 In the United States, an estimated 7 million children and adults received medical care for sports injury each year.8 The highest rates occur in children ages 5-14 years (59.3/1000 persons) and in the 15-24 age group (56.4/1000 persons). The rate of injury in males is more than twice that in females. In a 1999 study, sports injuries among high school athletes' resulted in approximately 2 million injuries, 500,000 doctor visits, and 30,000 hospitalizations annually.9,10 Most common injuries in sports medicine are sprains, strains, fractures, and concussions, but less common injuries include eye injuries, dental injuries, neck and cervical injuries, dehydration, and heat illnesses.8,11 According to a 2001 CDC report, sports-related injuries result in about 2.6 million emergency room visits annually. The most common reasons for sports-related emergency department visits for children and adolescents are injuries associated with basketball and pedal cycling (almost 900,000 a year), football and baseball injuries (250,000 visits per year), and soccer injuries (100,000 visits per year). The findings do not suggest that these sports are necessarily more dangerous; there may be more people engaging in these activities. In addition, ice or roller skating and skate boarding result in 150,000 visits, gymnastics and cheerleading in 146,000 visits, and water and snow sports in 100,000 visits each year. Injuries on the playground account for about 137,000 emergency department visits yearly.8,12
Principles of Acute Injury Prevention
The traditional injury prevention program in sports involves four stages:
1. Establishing the extent of the sports injury problem.
2. Establishing the etiology and mechanism of injury.
3. Introducing the preventive measures.
4. Assessing the effectiveness of the preventive interventions by repeating the first step.7,13
More complex socioenvironmental health promotion frameworks have been used to visualize the injury mechanism and relate them to structures of the environment. Various "modifying conditions" such as sports person factors (age, sex, ethnicity), physical environment (climate, air, soil and water quality, urbanization level), and social environment (family roles, winning pressure, financial resources) may have a role in resulting injury. Modifying conditions represent the sports person factors, social factors, and environmental factors that are independently involved in sport injury mechanism. Modifying conditions normally cannot be influenced by the intervention programs. On the other hand, the "mediating mechanisms" are factors that are regarded as modifiable and are targeted within planned interventions. Mediating mechanism may include factors such as sports person factors (sports specific skills, equipment, fatigue, substance abuse), physical environment (condition of sports facilities, floor/turf surface), and social environment (mass media, health care resources, access to organized sports, fair play policies).7,14-16
Bracht et al introduced a five-stage process that can be applied for organization of safety programs in sports communities: 16
1. Analysis of community structure, resources, injury "modifying factors" and "mediating mechanisms."
2. Design of safety program addressing identified mechanism and conditions.
3. Implementation of structural changes, information campaigns, and educational interventions.
4. Program maintenance and consolidation.
5. Evaluation and dissemination of the results.
The first stage is establishing the baseline for the program and priorities. This involves constructing a profile for specific sports that includes the incidence of the injury, assessing ongoing safety activities, and identifying modifying factors and mediating mechanisms associated with occurrence of the sports injury. The second stage involves setting up an organizational structure, defining safety goals, and designing safety interventions (e.g., structural changes and information campaigns in mass media or safety education). In the third stage, a timeline is established and interventions are implemented. The fourth stage involves the maintenance and sustainability of intervention efforts, for example, the integration of interventional activities into sports community structures and establishing a positive organizational climate to retain staff and volunteers. In the final stage, the interventions are evaluated and the results are disseminated.16
The intervention programs have been helpful in identifying preventable causes of sports injury and also have helped in designing guidelines in injury prevention. For example, in baseball, strict guidelines have been developed to determine safe pitch counts, rest period required, and age recommendations for various pitches. According to these guidelines, a 12-year-old athlete should have a maximum pitch count of 85 per game, should rest for at least 3 days if he throws more than 61 pitches, and should not be engaged in throwing sliders, forkballs, or screwballs to minimize the risk of shoulder and elbow injury.17
Prevention of Acute Ankle Injury
Ankle sprains are the most frequent injuries sustained in sports and often lead to chronic pain, swelling, and functional instability. In the United States, there are approximately 2 million moderate-to-severe ankle sprains every year, which accounts for an estimated 14-33% of all sports-related injuries. Up to 40% of individuals who sustain acute ankle sprains have been found to have symptoms of chronic ankle instability and recurrent injury.18,19 A 1983 study estimates the annual aggregate cost for moderate-to-severe ankle sprains in the United States is about $2 billion. Adjusted for inflation, this figure equates to $4.5 billion in today's economy (consumer price index, 2012). These data suggest that considerable morbidity and unnecessary medical cost potentially may be averted with effective ankle injury prevention and treatment programs.18,20-24
In a review of 22 studies, Kerkhoffs et al found that functional treatment was preferable to immobilization for the initial treatment of acutely injured ankles.25 Rehabilitation can begin when the pain and swelling are under control. A review of clinical trials supports the use of NSAIDs in the early phase of ankle sprains (less than 2 weeks). Functional ankle rehabilitation starts by normal joint range of motion (ROM), followed by gentle stretching and progressive weight-bearing exercises. Resistance exercises can begin when there is no pain through the available ROM with full weight bearing. (See Table 1.)26
Proprioceptive exercises are an integral part of acute ankle sprain rehabilitation. Patients with functional ankle stability following an acute ankle sprain have been found to have a significant deficit in balance compared with the controls. Proprioceptive training using ankle disks/wobble boards has been shown to significantly improve balance testing and decrease the symptoms of functional instability.27-30
The use of ankle support and taping has been found helpful in preventing recurrent ankle injury. This benefit is related to enhancement of proprioceptive function of an injured ankle with taping or bracing. Following a review of 113 studies, Thacker et al recommended the use of ankle orthosis for 6 months after an athlete sustains moderate-to-severe ankle sprain.31-32
Prevention of ACL Injury
Most ligament injuries are the result of excessive external forces applied to the limbs, while meniscus injuries are more likely secondary to torsional force generated within the limbs. However, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury can occur without any application of external force to the knee joint. There are approximately 200,000 ACL and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries annually in the United States alone. When combined, the cost of MRI, ACL reconstruction surgery, and post-operative rehabilitation translates into an average annual cost exceeding $3 billion. Typically, an ACL injury is considered a season-ending injury for an athlete, with average recovery time and return to sports taking about 6 to 9 months. In addition, the psychological impact of such an injury can be tremendous.33
Multiple studies and randomized controlled trials have shown the usefulness of an ACL injury prevention program among athletes. Female athletes have two- to 10-fold higher incidence of ACL injury compared with their male counterparts.34 The difference in anatomy including greater Q angle, increased femoral anteversion, excessive tibial torsion, and excessive subtalar pronation compared with male equivalents have been noted.35,36 In addition, women typically have a narrower A-shaped intercondyler notch compared with wider U-shaped notch in males of same height and weight.37 The role of hormones, biomechanical factors, and neuromuscular factors has been studied.33,38,39 The details of these studies are beyond the scope of this paper, but it is worth mentioning that irrespective of various risk factors, injury prevention programs have been successful in reducing the risk of lower limb injuries, including ACL injury. Most of these programs have emphasized proper landing techniques, which includes landing softly on the fore foot and then rolling back on the rear foot, avoiding excessive genu valgum at the knees on landing and squatting, and engaging hip and knee flexion on landing and with lateral maneuvers. In addition, increasing strength and flexibility of hamstrings, gluteus medius, and hip abductors has been utilized in most ACL prevention protocols.33,40-46 The use of prophylactics and the functional knee brace has not been able to demonstrate statistically significant injury reduction and is not currently recommended.33,47
Participation in school sports can benefit children, but it also carries a risk of injury, including concussion. An estimated 300,000 concussions occur in sports every year.48 A study conducted to summarize 16 years of NCAA injury surveillance data showed an increase in concussion injury rate per 1000 athletic-exposures from 0.17 in 1988-1999 to 0.34 in 2003-2004.49 One athletic exposure is defined as one athlete participating in one practice or game. This increase in concussion injury rate is partially because of an increase in sports activity and partially because of increased awareness and understanding of concussion. The most recent consensus statement on concussion was released at the third international conference on concussion in sports held in Zurich in 2008. The definition proposed at this conference is provided in Table 2.50
Concussion is caused by rotational and angular forces to the brain.51,52 These shear forces disrupt neural membranes allowing potassium efflux into extracellular space. The increase in calcium and excitatory amino acids are followed by further potassium efflux into extracellular space. This leads to suppression of neuronal activity.51-55 The disruption of autonomic regulation can persist for many weeks, and the brain may be vulnerable to additional injury. After a concussion, the brain may be susceptible to extremes of blood pressure. A catecholamine surge from the second impact to the head or body may cause vascular congestion, cerebral edema, increased intracranial pressure, and ultimately coma and death.54 There have been a few documented cases of the "second impact syndrome," and all of these deaths have occurred in persons younger than 20 years of age.51,54
The suspected diagnosis of concussion can include one or more of the following clinical domains:50
(a) Symptoms somatic (e.g., headache, pressure in the head, neck pain, nausea or vomiting, dizziness, tinnitus, blurred vision, sensitivity to light, sensitivity to sound, fatigue or low energy); cognitive (e.g., feeling like in a fog, feeling slowed down, "don't feel right," difficulty concentrating, difficulty remembering, confusion, slowed reaction time, inability to focus); and/or emotional (e.g., lability, personality changes, anxiety, depression)
(b) Physical signs (e.g., loss of consciousness, seizure or convulsions, amnesia, balance problems)
(c) Behavioral changes (e.g., irritability, sadness)
(d) Cognitive impairment (e.g., slowed reaction times)
(e) Sleep disturbance (e.g., drowsiness, increased or decreased sleep, difficulty initiating sleep).
If any one or more of these components is present, a concussion should be suspected and the appropriate management strategy instituted.
Baseline self-reported symptom (SRS) scales can be used at the time of pre-participation exam. This baseline score can assist in determining when the injury has resolved in a case where an athlete sustains a concussion. However, athletes may present with concussion-related symptoms at baseline. A recent study showed that a history of previous concussion, acute fatigue, physical illness, or orthopedic injury can alter normal baseline responses. If the athlete is currently experiencing fatigue, physical illness, or orthopedic injury, baseline testing should be postponed until the athlete improves.56 An athlete with a history of concussion or an elevated self-reported symptom score should be evaluated thoroughly.
In a recent study evaluating the sex differences in the concussion symptoms of high school athletes, there was no difference in the number of symptoms reported but there was a difference in the type of symptoms reported. Males reported amnesia, confusion, and disorientation more frequently than females, whereas females reported more drowsiness and phonophobia than did males. No differences were observed for the symptom resolution time in this study.57
An athlete with concussion may be evaluated in a hospital emergency department or doctor's office as a point of first contact following injury or may have been referred from another care provider. In addition to the points outlined above, the key features of this exam should include a determination of the need for emergent neuroimaging to exclude a more severe brain injury involving a structural abnormality. A comprehensive history and detailed neurological examination can be helpful in determining the need for imaging study. A comprehensive history may entail seeking additional information from parents, coaches, teammates, and eyewitnesses to the injury. It is worth mentioning that conventional structural neuroimaging is generally normal in concussive injury. Brain CT or MRI brain scan contributes little to concussion evaluation but should be employed whenever suspicion of an intracerebral structural lesion exists. Examples of such situations may include prolonged disturbance of conscious state, focal neurological deficit, evidence of skull fracture, or worsening symptoms. Once a serious structural injury is ruled out, a detailed evaluation involving symptom checklist, sideline assessment tools, neuropsychological test, and postural stability test are used to diagnose concussion.50 Although none are exclusively effective, combining these tools can increase sensitivity and specificity. Various assessment tools used in concussion diagnosis and management are listed in Table 3.58
Standard orientation questions are not sensitive enough for subtle changes caused by concussion. Modified Maddocks questions, which are part of SCAT 2, are sensitive for sideline assessment. Modified Maddocks questions are listed in Table 4.59
It appears that postural stability testing provides a useful tool for objectively assessing the motor domain of neurological functioning, and should be considered a reliable and valid addition to the assessment of athletes suffering from concussion, particularly where symptoms or signs indicate a balance component. A modified Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) 6 can be easily used in an office and is listed in Table 5.60
The cornerstone of concussion management is physical and cognitive rest until symptoms resolve and then a gradual program of exertion prior to medical clearance and return to play. A well-known phenomenon called "second impact syndrome" carries the risk of sudden death in an athlete and should be kept in mind while making a return-to-play decision. It may take minutes, hours, days, or weeks to recover from the symptoms. It is inappropriate for a child or adolescent athlete with a concussion to return to play on the same day as injury regardless of the level of athletic performance. During the period of recovery while symptomatic following an injury, it is important to lay emphasis on the necessity to have both physical and cognitive rest. Activities that require concentration and attention (e.g., scholastic work, video games, text messaging, etc.) may aggravate symptoms and possibly delay recovery. The recovery and outcome of this injury may be modified by a number of factors that may require more sophisticated management strategies. Once complete symptomatic and cognitive recovery are achieved, an athlete can be started on a graded return-to-play protocol.50,61,62
The application of neuropsychological testing in concussion has been shown to be of clinical importance and is designed to identify subtle cognitive deficits.55 Although in most cases cognitive recovery largely overlaps with the time course of symptom recovery, it has been recognized that cognitive recovery more commonly follows clinical symptom resolution, suggesting that the assessment of cognitive function should be an important component in any return to play modus operandi. Neuropsychological assessment should not be the solitary basis of management decisions; rather it should be seen as an aid to the clinical decision-making process in combination with a range of clinical domains and investigational results.50,55 Various commercial computer-based screening tools (e.g., ImPACT) are often utilized in sports clinics to assist in return to play decision making. In a majority of cases, neuropsychological testing is not done until the patient is symptom-free. In certain situations (e.g., child and adolescent athletes), testing may be done early while the patient is still symptomatic to assist in determining management. In patients with a complicated history, prolonged recovery time, or requiring medication to control symptoms, a formal neuropsychological evaluation through a neurophysiologist may be required to assist in return to play decision making. Athletes with concerning historical factors or concussive symptoms lasting more than 7-10 days may benefit from referral to an expert in concussion management. Some of these factors may include previous history of concussions, severity, comorbidities like ADHD, and sleep disorders.50
Helmets have been ineffective in the prevention of concussion injury, although a study conducted by Collins et al suggests that a newer design of football helmets (e.g., the Riddell Revolution, Elyria, OH) may have some protective role from concussion.63 Recently, a new system was developed to evaluate the protective performance of football helmets to integrate player head impact exposure and the risk of concussion. The Summation Test for the Analysis of Risk (STAR) relates on-field impact exposure to a series of drop tests performed at four impact location and six impact energy levels. The data from all drop tests are combined into one number using a complex formula. This new evaluation system is supposed to provide consumers with a meaningful metric to assess relative performance of football helmets.64
Concussion has different objectives in on-field assessment when the immediate safety of the athlete needs to be ensured and sideline assessment is needed to accurately determine what actions should be taken after the concussion occurs. The off-field/office assessment is required to determine the extent of the concussion and also to make the return to play decision. If physicians do not complete comprehensive assessments, they potentially could place athletes in dangerous situations. To ensure athletes' safety, established guidelines must be followed.65 Baseline measurements of subjective symptoms, balance testing, and neuropsychological testing should be obtained in high-risk contact/collision sports activity in the pre-participation physical exam. Managing a concussion can be challenging and requires a delicate balance between returning the player to sports as soon as possible and ensuring the athletes' safety. Clinicians should not be pressured by athletes, coaches, or teammates to return athletes to play too early.
Platelet-rich Plasma Therapy
Platelet-rich plasma therapy (PRP) recently has been promoted as an option to treat both acute and chronic musculoskeletal problems and to promote healing. A significant proportion of injuries in athletes results in long-standing symptoms and decreased performance. Most sports medicine physicians have to deal with situations when rapid recovery and early return to play is strongly desired by the athletes. Athletes may feel it affects their sports future, and in professional sports, it may translate directly into fame and money. PRP has been used as a treatment option with the objective of decreasing recovery time and facilitating earlier return to play without compromising the athlete's safety, performance, or the risk of recurrent injury.
Various growth factors long have been known for having tissue-healing properties. Early studies focused on purified isolated growth factors that were known to have a role in tissue healing. It is now well known that to target various signaling pathways, there is a need to administer a balanced combination of mediators. Isolated growth factors likely would not be able to satisfy the multiple requirements of the injured tissue.
The clinical rationale behind PRP therapy is that the treatment contains many biologically active growth factors, including proteins responsible for homeostasis. These growth factors support regeneration of new connective tissue and also assist in revascularization. The higher concentration of cytokines and growth factors in PRP may act locally as regulators of most basic repair functions in acute and chronic injuries.66 Typical hematomas formed after acute muscle tear contain about 94% red blood cells (RBC) and 6% platelets. RBCs in general do not contribute to the healing process. The idea behind the PRP therapy is to reverse the RBC:platelet ratio from about 94% RBC and 6% platelets to 94% platelets and 6% RBC to stimulate recovery.67,68
The main growth factors in the PRP concentrate are the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), vascular endothelial factor, epithelial growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor 1.66,68-70 Most of these growth factors play a role in muscle, ligament, cartilage, and bone healing by stimulating angiogenesis, epithelialisation, cell differentiation, and formation of extracellular matrix.68-71 In particular, TGF-beta is one of the most important factors involved in cartilage regeneration.72,73 TGF-beta is involved in the chondrocytes phenotype expression and differentiation of the mesenchymal stem cells. TGF-beta also has a role in matrix deposition and it counteracts with most of the suppressive effects of inflammatory mediators, including interleukin-1, on cartilage-specific macromolecules synthesis.67,74
Various in vitro and in vivo studies have been conducted to show the usefulness of PRP therapy after acute injury.67,72-81 In one study, after ultrasound-guided injections of platelet-released growth factors in 22 muscle injuries of 20 high-level professional athletes, full functional recovery was restored in as early as half of the expected time.82 Furthermore, fibrosis did not appear in any of the treated cases and no re-injuries occurred in any athletes after resuming their sports activities. There is a report of significant acceleration in functional recovery after surgical repair of ruptured Achilles tendons compared with a matched group who had conventional surgery.83 PRP therapy has been used to enhance the healing of meniscal defects,74 and to stimulate chondrocytes71-73 to synthesize cartilaginous tissues in animal models.84,85 These results are stimulating, since both the avascular cartilage and meniscus have limited chances of proper functional repair.
PRP treatment is considered an option in athletes with chronic tendon injury. Positive effects of PRP on tendon healing have been documented in animal studies.70,86 Most of the human studies published on the use of PRP for the treatment of tendon injuries are case studies. In a cohort study conducted by Mishra et al, there was a reported reduction in pain in patients treated with PRP therapy in cases of chronic severe lateral epicondylitis.87 Another small study using autologus blood injections followed by dry needling of tendon under ultrasound guidance suggested successful outcome in cases of refractory medial epicondylitis (golfer's elbow).88 Three studies have shown the benefit of PRP therapy in patellar tendinopathy.89,90
Cartilage injury is a significant part of morbidity of athletes and the general population. Studies also are being conducted to see the results of PRP treatment in patients with cartilage injury and osteoarthritis. In vitro studies have shown the evidence of enhanced secretion of hyaluronic acid by synovial fibroblast from arthritic patients when exposed to preprations rich in platelet-released growth factors.91 In a pilot study of more than 100 patients with osteoarthritis treated with an intra-articular PRP injection, statistically significant improvement in pain and function were observed. In this study, mild pain reaction and minimal effusion after the injection were the most common side effects reported. The patients were followed up at 2, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. The positive beneficial effects of improved function and pain reduction were observed at 12 months follow-up with a mean duration of beneficial effects lasting 9 months. However, the overall symptom reduction and quality of life at the 12-month follow-up continued to remain much higher than the baseline symptoms evaluation conducted before the initiation of the therapy.92 The intra-articular injection of PRP has been compared with the intra-articular hyaluronon injection. This observational retrospective cohort study in patients with knee osteoarthritis showed better pain control and improvement in function in patients treated with PRP compared with hyaluronan injections.93
Overall, there is sufficient evidence from in vitro and animal studies to strongly suggest the usefulness of PRP therapy and its role in tissue regeneration and also in chronic tendinopathies. However, there is a lack of adequately powered studies and RCTs to substantiate the use of PRP therapy in humans. More human studies are being conducted and the results are likely to become available in the near future. In general, the use of PRP appears to be safe with mixed results on the potential beneficial effects of PRP over traditional management. Further studies are needed to validate the role of PRP and to define clear indications for its use in various musculoskeletal problems.
Prolotherapy is aimed at the rehabilitation of an incompetent structure by the generation of new collagen tissue accomplished by injecting a proliferant solution into the osseo-ligamenteous junction of the dysfunctional spinal segments. Prolotherapy involves injection of proliferant material, which stimulates the production of new cells. The goal of most rehabilitative programs is to improve the performance of supporting musculature, but the ligament insufficiency and instability of the joint structures is ignored. Prolotherapy focuses on the rehabilitation of passive structures, including ligaments and tendons, with a goal to neutralize instability, correct the dysfunction of these structures, and thus alleviate pain.
The healing cascade is comprised of three stages:94-96
1. Early inflammation when the tissue damage results in spillage of cell contents into the wound sites. The granulocytes debride the wound in this early stage.
2. Late inflammation when macrophages and monophages secrete humoral factors to attract fibroblasts.
3. Fibroblasts lay down new collagen fibers adding strength to the wound.
After injury, connective tissue can return to its normal length but it only regains 50-70% of its original strength.97 Weakened ligaments may result in instability and recurrent injuries in the affected area. Nocioceptors in the ligaments have limited stretch capabilities and any abnormal stretch of the ligament results in stretching of the pain receptors culminating in pain response and muscle inhibition. This may result in exercise intolerance, which in turn may result in progressive weakening of the ligaments and instability. This perpetuates the vicious cycle and results in poor rehabilitative outcome. Any interruption in the healing process may lead to even poorer outcome.96,97
Prolotherapy works by initiating the healing cascade and fibroblasts. Most solutions used for prolotherapy trigger inflammation and eventually fibroblastic proliferation. In one study, histological samples of tissue from the posterior sacroiliac joint ligament were taken 2 weeks before prolotherapy. Repeat samples were taken from the same ligament 3 months after the prolotherapy treatment. Comparison of these tissue samples by light microscopy revealed increased number of total collagen fibers in 3 months post prolotherapy treatment compared with samples taken 2 weeks before the therapy.98
In 1939, Hackett et all gave prolotherapy injections to the spine. Different agents have been used in the past including a mixture of glucose, glycerine, and phenol. Currently, dextrose solution and sodium morrhuate are commonly used. Irritants like phenol and tannic acid work by causing local cell death, thus stimulating the healing process. Osmotics like glucose solution and glycerine or zinc sulfate dehydrate the tissue thus causing local damage and inflammation.96 Since the first step in healing is inflammation, NSAIDs should be avoided in patients receiving prolotherapy.
The potential toxicity from injection of phenol has been studied. Phenol is produced in humans during the digestion of proteins and is rapidly metabolized by the liver to less-toxic substances. The concentration of naturally occuring phenol present in the urines of untreated patients is greater than the amount that might be injected during a prolotherapy session. Furthermore, phenol has a half life of 1-4.5 hours and is completely eliminated from the body in 24 hours; therefore, there is little chance of chronic cumulative toxicity.99
Cases of death have been reported with inadvertent injection of zinc sulfate and phenol solution in the subarachnoid spaces resulting in severe arachnoiditis and subsequent death.100 There have been two reported cases of sterile meningitis after inadvertent injection of a P2G (phenol, glucose, glycerine, lidocaine, and water) solution by accidently puncturing the dura while attempting to inject the interspinous ligament.101 Both of these cases resolved without complications. Several authors maintain that with proper technique and strict adherence to the appropriate injection procedure, the risk can be minimized. Animal studies and earlier human studies have shown evidence of beneficial effects in various structural and ligamentous abnormalities including mechanical low back pain,102-105 discogenic pain,97,104,106 osteitis pubis,105,107 foot problems,108 fibromyalgia,109 and overuse tendinopathies.110
During the past 10 years, musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSKUS)has become a useful imaging, as well as an interventional modality in sports medicine. With the rapid development and sophistication of this modality, essential information for the increased understanding of the pathophysiology of many disorders has been established. With increased utilization of MSKUS in sports medicine, it will be useful for primary care physicians to become familiar with the advantages and disadvantages of the MSKUS. Musculoskeletal ultrasound is invaluable for its ready availability, low cost, speed, and diagnostic accuracy. Musculoskeletal ultrasound also offers some specific advantages over MRI, such as higher resolution capabilities and the ability to examine the tissue in both static and dynamic states with the patient in different positions. MSKUS allows rapid real-time evaluation and also rapid comparison with the same structures on the contra-lateral side.111,112
Ultrasound is safe and free from ionizing radiation. In patients who have contraindications to use of MRI or MRI claustrophobia, ultrasound can be an attractive alternative assuming the lesion is suitable for evaluation by ultrasound. In ultrasound machines with power Doppler capabilities, it allows for evaluation for "neovascularization" in tendinopathies.
One disadvantage of MSKUS is that it is operator-dependent and requires a long learning curve for competence in scan skills. MSKUS cannot penetrate the bones to any useful levels but is very useful in the detection of bony erosions, calluses, and stress fractures. Artifacts are common pitfalls in the evaluation with MSKUS with the most common being anisotropy.113 (See Figure 1.)
The shoulder is one of the most common applications of the MSKUS due to the high incidence of rotator cuff disorders related to increasing age and sporting activities. Many papers discussing the accuracy of musculoskeletal ultrasound already have been published in radiological and orthopedic literature. Although the use of ultrasound is operator dependent, in skilled hands and with appropriate equipment, this technique provides assessment of rotator cuff pathology with high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of both partial and full thickness tears.111,112
Interventional ultrasound refers to a wide and heterogeneous range of invasive procedures performed percutaneously using ultrasound guidance. Most of these procedures include aspiration of fluid from a cyst or a joint or injection of medication either into a joint cavity, tendon sheath, or para-articular soft tissue.113
1. National Federation of State High School Associations. NFHS Participation Figures Search. Available at: www.nfhs.org/content.aspx?id=3282. Accessed Feb. 15, 2012.
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010 (2nd ed.). Washington, DC. Available at http://www.health.gov/healthypeople. Accessed Feb. 15, 2002.
3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Available at: http://www.health.gov/PAGuidelines/. Accessed Feb. 15, 2012.
4. Cawley J, Meyerhoefer C. The medical costs of obesity: An instrumental variables approach. J Health Econ 2012;31:219-230.
5. Hergenroeder AC. Prevention of sports injuries. Pediatrics 1998;101:1057-1063.
6. Koester MC. Youth sports: A pediatrician's perspective on coaching and injury prevention. J Athl Train 2000:35;466-470.
7. Timpka T, et al. From sports injury prevention to safety promotion in sports. Sports Med 2006;36:733-745.
8. Conn JM, et al. Sports and recreation related injury episodes in the US population, 1997-99. Inj Prev 2003;9:117-123.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sports-related injuries among high school athletesUnited States, 2005–06 school year. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006;55:1037-1040.
10. Powell JW, Barber-Foss KD. Injury patterns in selected high school sports: A review of the 1995-1997 seasons. J Athl Train 1999;34:277-284.
11. Huffman EA, et al. Epidemiology of rare injuries and conditions among United States high school athletes during the 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 school years. J Athl Train 2008;43:624-630.
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sports-related injuries cause 2.6 million vists annually by children and young adults to emergency rooms. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/01news/sports.htm. Released March 5, 2001.
13. van Mechelen W, et al. Incidence, severity, aetiology and prevention of sports injuries. A review of concepts. Sports Med 1992;14:82-99.
14. Sorensen G, et al. Model for incorporating social context in health behavior interventions. Applications for cancer prevention for working-class, multiethnic populations. Prev Med 2003;37:188-197.
15. Booth SL, et al. Environmental and societal factors affect food choice and physical activity: Rationale, influences, and leverage points. Nutr Rev 2001;59(3 Pt 2):S21-S39.
16. Bracht N, et al. A five stage community organization model for health promotion. In: Health Promotion at the Community Level: New Advances. Bracht N, Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.
17. Lyman S, et al. Effect of pitch type, pitch count, and pitching mechanics on risk of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med 2002;30:463-468.
18. Verhagen RA, et al. Long-term follow up of inversion trauma of the ankle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1995;114:92-96.
19. Gerber JP, et al. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: A prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int 1998;19:653-660.
20. Soboroff SH, et al. Benefits, risks, and costs of alternative approach to the evaluation and treatment of severe ankle sprain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;160-168.
21. Garrick JG, Requa RK. The epidemiology of foot and ankle injuries in sports. Clin Sports Med 1988;7:29-36.
22. Berger-Vachon C, et al. Soccer accidents in French Rhode-Alpes Soccer Association. Sports Med 1986;3:69-77.
23. Ekstrand J, Tropp H. The incidence of ankle sprains in soccer. Foot Ankle 1990;11:41-44.
24. Jackson DW, et al. Ankle sprains in young athletes: Relation of severity and disability. Clin Orthop 1974;101:201-215.
25. Kerkhoffs GM, et al. Immobilisation for acute ankle sprain: A systemic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2001;121:426-471.
26. Osborne MD. Chronic ankle instability. In: Frontera WR, Silver JK, eds. Essentials of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Philadelphia, PA: Hanley & Belfus Inc., 2002: 409-413.
27. Goldie PA, et al. Postural control following inversion injuries of the ankle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:969-975.
28. Tropp H, Odenrick P. Postural control in single-limb stance. J Orthop Res 1988;6:833-839.
29. Hoffman M, Payne VG. The effects of proprioceptive ankle disk training on healthy subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995;21:90-93.
30. Gauffin H, et al. Effect of ankle disk training on postural control in patient with functional instability of the ankle joint. Int J Sports Med 1988;9:141-144.
31. Tropp H, et al. Prevention of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 1985;13:259-262.
32. Thacker SB, et al. The prevention of ankle sprains in sports: A systemic review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 1999;27:753-760.
33. Silvers HJ, Mandelbaum BR. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injury in the female athlete. Br J Sports Med 2007;41(Suppl 1):i52-i59.
34. Arendt E, Dick R. Knee injury patterns among men and women in collegiate basketball and soccer. NCAA data and review of literature. Am J Sports Med 1995;23:694-701.
35. Huston LJ, et al. Gender differences in knee angle when landing from a drop-jump. Am J Knee Surg 2001;14:215-19.
36. McLean SG, et al. Knee joint kinematics during the sidestep cutting maneuver: Potential for injury in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999;31:959-968.
37. Shelbourne KD, et al. The relationship between intercondylar notch width of the femur and the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears. Am J Sports Med 1988;26:402-408.
38. Yu WD, et al. Effect of estrogen on cellular metabolism of the human anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop 1999;336:229-238.
39. Wojtys EM, et al. Association between the menstrual cycle and anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes. Am J Sports Med 1998;26:614-619.
40. Hewett TE, et al. The effect of neuromuscular training on the incidence of knee injury in female athletes: A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 1999;27:699-706.
41. Silvers HJ, Mandelbaum BR. Preseason conditioning to prevent soccer injuries in young women. Clin J Sport Med 2001;11:206.
42. Myklebust G, et al. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female team handball players: A prospective intervention study over three seasons. Clin J Sport Med 2003;13:71-78.
43. Pfeiffer RP, et al. Lack of effect of a knee ligament injury prevention program on the incidence of noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:1769-1774.
44. Soderman K, et al. Balance board training: Prevention of traumatic injuries of the lower extremities in female soccer players? A prospective randomized intervention study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2000;8:356-363.
45. Wedderkopp N, et al. Comparison of two intervention programmes in young female players in European handball with and without ankle disc. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2003;13:371-375.
46. Olsen OE, et al. Exercises to prevent lower limb injuries in youth sports: Cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005;330:449.
47. Deppen RJ, Landfried MJ. Efficacy of prophylactic knee bracing in high school football players. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994;20:243-246.
48. Guskeiwicz KM, et al. Epidemiology of concussion in collegiate and high school football players. Am J Sports Med 2000;28:643-650.
49. Hootman JM, et al. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: Summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train 2007;42:311-319.
50. McCrory P, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport the Third International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2008. Phys Sportsmed 2009;37:141-159.
51. Concussion (mild traumatic brain injury) and the team physician: A consensus statement. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2006;38:395-399.
52. Meehan WP III, Bachur RG. Sport-related concussion. Pediatrics 2009;123:114-123.
53. Patel DR, Reddy V. Sport-related concussion in adolescents. Pediatr Clin North Am 2010;57:649-670.
54. Halstead ME, Walker KD; Council on Sports Medicine And Fitness. American Academy of Pediatrics. Clinical report Sport-related concussion in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2010;126:597-615.
55. Randolph C, et al. Concussion symptom inventory: An empirically derived scale for monitoring resolution of symptoms following sport related concussion. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2009;24:219-229.
56. Piland SG, et al. Investigation of baseline self-report concussion symptom scores. J Athl Train 2010;45:273-278.
57. Frommer LJ, et al. Sex differences in concussion symptoms of high school athletes. J Athl Train 2011;46:76-84.
58. Scorza KA, et al. Current concepts in concussion: Evaluation and management. Am Fam Physician 2012;85:123-132.
59. Maddocks DL, et al. The assessment of orientation following concussion in athletes. Clin J Sports Med 1995;5:32-35.
60. Guskeiwicz KM. Assessment of postureal stability following sport-related concussion. Curr Sports Med Rep 2003;2:24-30.
61. Osborne B. Principles of liability for athletic trainers: Managing sport-related concussion. J Athl Train 2001;36:316-321.
62. Oliaro S, et al. Management of cerebral concussion in sports: The athletic trainer's perspective. J Athl Train 2001;36:257-262.
63. Collins M, et al. Examining concussion rates and return to play in high school football players wearing newer helmet technology: A three-year prospective cohort study. Neurosurgery 2006;58:275-286.
64. Rowson S, Duma SM. Development of the STAR evaluation system for football helmets: Integrating player head impact exposure and risk of concussion. Ann Biomed Eng 2011;39:2130-2140.
65. Susco TM. Establishing concussion-assessment guidelines: On-field, sideline, and off-field. Hum Kinet 2003;ATT8(4):48-50.
66. Heldin CH, Westermark B. Mechanism of action and in vivo role of platelet-derived growth factor. Physiol Rev 1999;79;1283-1316.
67. Sanchez M, et al. Platelet-rich therapies in the treatment of orthopedic sports injuries. Sports Med 2009;39:345-354.
68. Marx RE, et al. Platelet-rich plasma: Growth factor enhancement for bone grafts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85:638-646.
69. Shi Y, Massague J. Mechanism of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell 2003;113:685-700.
70. Aspenberg P. Simulation of tendon repair: Mechanical loading, GDFs and platelets. A mini-review. Int Orthop 2007;31:783-789.
71. Vunjak-Novakovic G, et al. Tissue engineering of ligaments. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 2004;6;131-156.
72. Song SU, et al. Hyaline cartilage regeneration using mixed human chondrocytes and transforming growth factor-beta1-producing chondrocytes. Tissue Eng 2005;11:1516-1526.
73. Song SU, et al. Regeneration of hyaline articular cartilage with irradiated transforming growth factor beta-1 producing fibroblasts. Tissue Eng 2004;10:665-672.
74. Ishida K, et al. The regenerative effects of platelet-rich plasma on meniscal cells in vitro and its in vivo application with biodegradable gelatin hydrogel. Tissue Eng 2007;13:1103-1112.
75. Ulrich-Vinther M, et al. Articular cartilage biology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003;11:421-430.
76. Hammond JW, et al. Use of autologous platelet-rich plasma to treat muscle strain injuries. Am J Sports Med 2009;37:1135-1142.
77. Werner S. Grose R. Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev 2003;83:835-870.
78. Tabata Y. Tissue regeneration based on growth factor release. Tissue Eng 2003;9(Suppl 1):S5-15.
79. Anitua E, et al. New insights into and novel applications for platelet-rich fibrin therapies. Trends Biotechnol 2006;24:227-234.
80. Molloy T, et al. The roles of growth factors in tendon and ligament healing. Sports Med 2003;33:381-394.
81. Virchenko O, Aspenberg P. How can one platelet injection after tendon injury lead to a stronger tendon after 4 weeks? Interplay between early regeneration and mechanical stimulation. Acta Orthop 2006;77:806-812.
82. Wright-Carpenter T, et al. Treatment of muscle injuries by local administration of autologous conditioned serum: A pilot study on sportsmen with muscle strains. Int J Sports Med 2004;25:588-593.
83. Sanchez M, et al. Comparison of surgically repaired Achilles tendon tears using platelet-rich fibrin matrices. Am J Sports Med 2007;35:245-251.
84. Murray MM, et al. Use of a collagen-platelet rich plasma scaffold to stimulate healing of a central defect in the canine ACL. J Orthop Res 2006;24:820-830.
85. Akeda K, et al. Platelet-rich plasma stimulates porcine articular chondrocyte proliferation and matrix biosynthesis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006;14:1272-1280.
86. Kajikawa Y, et al. Platelet-rich plasma enhances the initial mobilization of circulation-derived cells for tendon healing. J Cell Physiol 2008;215:837-845.
87. Mishra A, Pavelko T. Treatment of chronic elbow tendinosis with buffered platelet-rich plasma. Am J Sports Med 2006;34:1774-1778.
88. Suresh SPS, et al. Medial epicondylitis: Is ultrasound guided autologous blood injection an effective treatment? Br J Sports Med 2006;40:935-939.
89. Volpi P, et al. Treatment of chronic patellar tendinosis with buffered platelet rich plasma: A preliminary study. Med Sport 2007;60:595-603.
90. Filardo G, et al. Use of platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of refractory jumper's knee. Int Orthop 2010;34:909-915.
91. Anitua E, et al. Platelet-released growth factors enhance the secretion of hyaluronic acid and induce hepatocyte growth factor production by synovial fibroblasis from arthritic patients. Rheumatology 2007;46:1769-1772.
92. Kon E, et al. Platelet-rich plasma: Intra-articular knee injections produced favorable results on degenerative cartilage lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18:472-479.
93. Sánchez M, et al. Intra-articular injection of an autologous preparation rich in growth factors for the treatment of knee OA: A retrospective cohort study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008;26:910-913.
94. Tidball JG, Inflammatory cell response to acute muscle injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995;27:1022-1032.
95. Tidball JG. Inflammatory processes in muscle injury and repair. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2005;288;R345-353.
96. Banks AR. A rationale for prolotherapy. J Orthop Med 1991;13:54-59.
97. Frank C, et al. Normal ligament properties and ligament healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985;196:15-25.
98. Klein RG, et al. Proliferant injections for low back pain: Histologic changes of injected ligaments and objective measurements of spine mobility before and after treatment. J Neurol Orthop Med 1989;10:141-144.
99. Banks A. Phenol in prolotherapy. J Orthop Med 1996;18:21-23.
100. Schneider RC, Williams JJ. Fatality after injection of sclerosing agent to precipitate fibro-osseous proliferation. JAMA 1959;170:80-84.
101. Grayson MF. Sterile meningitis after lumbosacral ligament sclerosing injections. J Orthop Med 1994;16:98-99.
102. Marcus NJ, et al. A comprehensive protocol to diagnose and treat pain of muscular origin may successfully and reliably decrease or eliminate pain in a chronic pain population. Pain Med 2010;11:25-34.
103. Fonstad P. Prolotherapy in the treatment of chronic low back pain: A literature review. J Manual Manip Ther 205;13:27-34.
104. Mathews RS, et al. Treatment of mechanical and chemical lumbar discopathy with 25% dextrose in water intradiscal injection. Presented at the North American Orthopaedic Medicine Annual Meeting; April 30, 2003; Orlando FL.
105. Topol GA, et al. Efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy in elite male kicking-sport athletes with chronic groin pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:697-702.
106. Ongley MJ, et al. A new approach to the treatment of chronic low back pain. Lancet 1987;2:143-146.
107. Topol GA, Reeves KD. Regenerative injection of elite athletes with career-altering chronic groin pain who fail conservative treatment: A consecutive case series. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:890-902.
108. Tsatsos G, Mandal R. Prolotherapy in the treatment of foot problems. J Am Podiatric Med Assoc 2002;92:366-368.
109. Reeves KD. Treatment of consecutive severe fibromyalgia patients with prolotherapy. J Orthop Med 1994;16:84-89.
110. Alfredson H, Ohberg L. Sclerosing injections to areas of neovascularization reduces pain in chronic Achilles tendinopathy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Trauma Arthrosc 2005;13:338-344.
111. Bianchi S, Martinoli C. Ultrasound of the Musculoskeletal System. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2007. ISBN 978-3-540-42267-9.
112. Jacobson JA. Fundamentals of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. ISBN 978-1-4160-3593-0.
113. Robertson D, Brown J. An introduction to musculoskeletal ultrasound in sports and exercise medicine. Sportex Medicine 2007;33:20-26.