Rapid intake energizes no-wait ED model
Staff's solutions equal high patient satisfaction
Getting an entire staff of physicians, nurses, and techs to do things differently is never easy, but you can clear away hurdles by giving them the ability to formulate some of their own solutions. That, at least, has been the experience of Swedish Medical Center in Issaquah, WA, in its quest to implement a more efficient, no-wait ED concept. The approach appears to be sitting well with patients, too. Administrators say that that the ED has been able to deliver on its no-wait promise in nearly every case, and patient satisfaction is greater than 95%, according to Press Ganey surveys.
Getting to this point involved a process of trial and experimentation that began with the opening of a freestanding ED back in 2005, explains John Milne, MD, MBA, the vice president of medical affairs at Swedish Medical Center, who oversees three of the organization's EDs, including the one at Issaquah. "That was the first step in a bridge strategy as we were building a new hospital in the community," says Milne, noting that he was one of the physicians who started the group that was staffing that ED, which has since closed. "The department we created there was in many ways a laboratory for a variety of things around efficiency, flow, and process," he says.
Given a blank slate to work with, staff members were empowered to tweak, tune, and manipulate the no-wait model. A group of nurses, in particular, were highly motivated to come up with solutions, says Anne Neethling, RN, who managed the initial freestanding ED, but is now the nurse manager of the ED on the Issaquah hospital campus. "They were really fed up with the way regular or normal EDs worked, especially the long wait process," says Neethling. "They were given the opportunity to try out some new ways of doing this."
Opt for a rapid intake approach
The result of all this experimentation is a process that begins with a burst of activity as soon as a patient presents for care.
"Any patients who come to the front registration desk provide three pieces of information: their name, their birth date, and another identifier. Then they get placed in a room right away, so nobody has to wait outside," says Neethling. "Then the process of triage, diagnostics, and treatment is started immediately, which has been a great satisfier for patients who are not used to this system."
Milne likens this phase of the process to the way pit crews service cars in the midst of a NASCAR race. "We refer to it as swarming," he says. "When a patient comes to a room, you've got the primary nurse who is taking care of him, but then a tech comes into the room, the charge nurse is there as another set of hands, and the physician is trying to get into the room as quickly as possible as well."
During the first 5-10 minutes, there may be as many as six people in the room tending to the patient during the initial intake event. "This ultimately frees up additional resources to move on to that next patient so that when a surge does happen, where you have one patient after another you are moving faster, so on the back end it saves time in the sense that there is more capacity," says Milne. "The patient is out of the department sooner, so we have another room available."
There can be as many as three or four patient intakes going on at the same time, and by taking care of the diagnostics early on, patients move through the system swiftly, says Milne, who contrasts the process with a traditional triage approach. "The concept of triage is essentially a misnomer. You basically have created a bottleneck choke point — a triage nurse or a triage entry point — which, from my perspective, adds limited value," he observes. "The highest-risk person is the one who is waiting in the waiting room, and we all hear stories of facilities where patients die of a heart attack in the waiting room after they have been sitting there for four or five hours after they have been triaged. Triage is not a perfect system, so the better choice, from our perspective, is to get patients back and evaluated, and have a rapid intake process."
Listen to staff
Milne suggests that administrators are now grappling with the biggest challenge involved with implementing the new model: finding ways to sustain the initial vision, and to continue to empower staff to own their portion of the workflow. The burden of this task largely rests with managers, adds Milne, who notes that it is not enough to hold a monthly staff meeting.
"Anne [Neethling] comes in early every morning and huddles with staff. She spends time trying to understand their issues while reinforcing the vision, and nipping in the bud any seeds of discontent," says Milne. "At the same time, the staff know she is an advocate for them with senior administration, even while she is continually challenging them to do better."
It's a balancing act, acknowledges Neethling, but staff members are responsive when they have a seat at the table. "This is not a top-down thing that has been mandated. There are obviously budget constraints that have to be followed, but the biggest success from this whole thing came from the fact that the front-line people who were actually doing the job were listened to and taken seriously," she says. "They felt they had some ownership, so that is a big part of what we are still trying to work on every day."
Processes don't always go smoothly, Neethling emphasizes. There might be a staffing issue on the floor, or a patient might not get moved along as quickly as he or she should. These issues come up on a daily basis, and you have to keep working at them, she says. "However, when you establish ownership, it makes a huge difference. You don't feel like you have to keep pushing people. You can actually work with them and walk with them in the right direction, and encourage others to follow in the same way."
Become accustomed to parallel processing
One of the challenges administrators at the Issaquah ED ran into when they began to implement the no-wait concept was the mentality among many of the ED nurses that it was a sign of weakness to have someone come in and help them with a patient, says Milne.
"They were used to doing everything themselves, but they were using serial processing," explains Milne. As a result, it would take 20 to 30 minutes to complete the intake process on a patient.
Conversely, with the "swarming" intake process, there are typically three or four people carrying out several tasks simultaneously, so getting over this mental hurdle took some time, explains Milne. "Once the nurses were able to embrace the concept, the department started humming and moving a lot more efficiently," he says.
There has to be ownership and understanding and teamwork for the model to work well, explains Neethling.
"There cannot be anyone, including the physicians, who is a solo flyer because then it doesn't work," she says. "Staff need to learn to respect and rely on other people, including people from other departments that service the ED."