Skip to main content

All Access Subscription

Get unlimited access to our full publication and article library.

Get Access Now

Interested in Group Sales? Learn more

Logo IRB

IRB Advisor – May 1, 2015

May 1, 2015

View Archives Issues

  • Smartphone apps are a new frontier for minimal risk studies

    Now, entire research studies are being run through a handful of apps, released in mid-March, through the iTunes App Store. These apps consent study participants, determine eligibility of participants, and run study tasks — all without the need for participants to travel to study sites.

  • OHRP and FDA address electronic informed consent

    Federal regulatory agencies acknowledged in recent draft guidance that research informed consent is moving in directions not quite imagined several decades ago. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) published draft guidance for industry, clinical investigators, and IRBs in the “Use of an Electronic Informed Consent in Clinical Investigations” in the March 9, 2015, Federal Register.

  • Clinical research training course provides interactive instruction

    Human research protection program (HRPP) training at the institutional level often lacks uniformity and evidence-based strategies, some experts say. Some organizations and research programs require new investigators and IRB staff to have extensive online coursework or on-campus classes, and others provide only general guidelines and requirements.

  • IRB’s HRPP training class covers multiple areas

    A research institution’s centralized research training program began as a way to help new investigators and research teams learn more about the IRB process and human research protection. But the program, called Navigating Clinical Research, has expanded into a comprehensive training course that uses a variety of adult learning strategies.

  • Case study: IRB deals with social network analysis issues

    The IRB at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign had a number of issues to consider when researchers submitted a study involving a social network analysis on sensitive issues. In this case, the sensitive issue was sexual assault on a college campus.

  • Network of bioethicists gives guidance to investigators faced with complex ethics issues

    IRBs typically give guidance to researchers only during the pre-study regulatory review process, but investigators also struggle with ethical questions that arise during research. “For years, this has been done informally,” says Benjamin Wilfond, MD, director of the Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics at Seattle Children’s Research Institute.