Skip to main content

Relias Media has upgraded our site!

Please bear with us as we work through some issues in order to provide you with a better experience.

Thank you for your patience.

All Access Subscription

Get unlimited access to our full publication and article library.

Get Access Now

Interested in Group Sales? Learn more

HICprevent

Hicprevent header 1470747688

This award-winning blog supplements the articles in Hospital Infection Control & Prevention.

OSHA’s top 10 bloodborne citations winner is...`No exposure control plan'

January 12th, 2015

Hospitals that fail to keep their exposure control plans current could be slapped with a citation from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which requires an annual review and update of the policies. Last year, hospitals were most likely to be cited for not having a written exposure control plan at all or for failing to update plans already on the books. They were also frequently cited for failing to document consideration of new devices, according to OSHA data. The Bloodborne Pathogen Standard was the most commonly cited standard in inspections of hospitals.

“Once you have a plan and you have devices, your job isn’t complete. You have to be diligent in looking at newer devices each year to see whether you need any updates in your [exposure control] plan,” says Dionne Williams, MPH, a senior industrial hygienist at OSHA. “Staying on top of the program is going to be the key to protecting workers,” she says. If employees fail to activate needle safety devices, the problem might lie with the device. Using a device that automatically engages the safety feature may address that issue, Williams says. OSHA does not require employers to purchase more recent needle devices, only to evaluate them. But if an inspector observes inactivated devices in sharps containers, that might prompt a closer look at the exposure control plan, Williams says. Sometimes, the problem lies with the training. The hospital is responsible for making sure agency nurses and other contract workers with potential exposure receive training, she says. Physicians also need to be included in annual training, she says. “Even though they may have very in-depth knowledge about health care and diseases, they still need training on bloodborne pathogens. They still need to know what the facility’s procedures are, and training on the devices,” Williams says. Training is required if the hospital adds new procedures that pose a bloodborne pathogen hazard or if new devices are introduced. But even when there are no changes, the training helps keep employees aware of the risks, she says. “Employees themselves can get into a routine, which is why we have the requirement to have annual training,” she says. The most common sections of the Bloodborne Pathogen Standard cited by OSHA in 2011 were: 1. 1030(c)(1)(i) Failure to have a written exposure control plan. 2. 1030(c)(1)(iv) Failure to update the exposure control plan annually, reflecting new tasks or procedures. 3. 1030(g)(2)(i) Failure to provide training to employees with occupational exposure. 4. 1030(d)(2)(i) Failure to use safety engineered devices or work practice controls to reduce risk 5. 1030(f)(2)(i) Failure to offer the hepatitis b vaccine to employees with potential exposure. 6. 1030(h)(5)(i) Failure to maintain a sharps injury log. 7. 1030(f)(2)(iv) Failure to obtain a signed declination for employees who decline hepatitis B vaccine. 8. 1030(c)(1)(v) Failure to solicit input of frontline health care workers in the selection of sharps devices. 9. 1030(c)(1)(iv)(B) Failure to annually consider new sharps safety devices. 10. 1030(f)(1)(i) Failure to provide post-exposure vaccination and follow-up for hepatitis B.

--Michele Marill