Relias Media - Continuing Medical Education Publishing

The trusted source for

healthcare information and

CONTINUING EDUCATION.

  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • MyAHC
    • Home
      • Home
      • Newsletters
      • Blogs
      • Archives
      • CME/CE Map
      • Shop
    • Emergency
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Live Webinars
      • On-Demand Webinars
      • Libraries
    • Hospital
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Live Webinars
      • On-Demand Webinars
      • Libraries
    • Clinical
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Live Webinars
      • On-Demand Webinars
    • All Access
      • Learn More
      • My Subscription
    • My Account
      • My Subscriptions
      • My Content
      • My Orders
      • My CME/CE
      • My Transcript
    Home » Mediation effective, but many skeptical

    Mediation effective, but many skeptical

    February 1, 2011
    No Comments
    Reprints
    Facebook Twitter Linkedin Share Share

    Mediation effective, but many skeptical

    Mediation can not only reduce the costs of malpractice litigation, but also has the potential to offer closure to plaintiffs and ensure that procedures are changed in hospitals to prevent recurrences of the error that sparked the lawsuit, according to a recent study. However, too often that potential goes unrealized, because doctors and hospitals are often reluctant to participate.

    Barriers put up by doctors, hospitals, and their lawyers often stand in the way of mediation being employed effectively, says author Carol Liebman, JD, a professor at the Columbia Law School in New York City. The study was published in the Journal of Health, Politics, Policy and Law.1

    Her study found that mediation can not only reduce the costs of litigation, but it also has the potential to offer closure to plaintiffs and ensure that procedures are changed in hospitals to prevent recurrences of the error that generated the lawsuit. However, too often that potential goes unrealized, she says.

    "Change will require medical leaders, hospital administrators, and malpractice insurers to temper their suspicion of the tort system sufficiently to approach medical errors and adverse events as learning opportunities — and to retain lawyers who embrace mediation as an opportunity to solve problems, show compassion, and improve care," Liebman says.

    Liebman, an internationally recognized expert on mediation and negotiation, directs the Law School's Mediation Clinic. Co-author Chris Stern Hyman, JD, was formerly an Adjunct Research Scholar at the Law School.

    The study looked at 31 cases from 11 nonprofit hospitals in New York City in 2006 and 2007 that went to mediation. About 70% of the cases settled either during or after mediation, resulting in monetary settlements from $35,000 to $1.7 million.

    On the surface, Liebman says, the case for mediation would appear to be compelling in medical malpractice cases. She cites these reasons:

    • The outcome is under the parties' control.

    • Plaintiffs can receive payment soon after the harm instead of waiting years.

    • Defendants do not have to pay outside lawyers to try the case.

    • Members of the medical staff do not have to prepare for discovery and a trial.

    • Even if the mediation does not resolve the case, it may create enough momentum to lead to a settlement.

    In spite of those benefits and the fact that many of the mediated cases settled, Liebman says "major challenges" remain for mediation to gain greater acceptance in malpractice suits.

    "Most significantly, in none of the cases studied did a doctor take part in the mediation," she says. "It is possible that plaintiffs would have been even more satisfied with the process had their physicians demonstrated respect and caring" by attending the mediation.

    Defense lawyers often cited the doctors' work schedules to explain their absence, Liebman says. Others did not want to subject the doctors to being verbally attacked by the plaintiff. This "deprives them and their patients of the opportunity for healing, understanding, forgiveness, and repair of broken relationships and failed communication," the study concluded.

    The authors cited research that found patients expect an apology after a medical error, and that most doctors want to oblige, but they — and their lawyers — refrain from doing so out of fear of legal liability. However, the confidentiality of mediation would obviate that, Liebman says.

    "Anecdotes abound of injured patients and their family members who have continued to seek care from — and even recommended to their friends — hospitals that apologize for medical errors and adverse events," according to the study.

    The absence of doctors in mediation also limits the ability, the authors write, for doctors and hospitals to learn from the medical errors and improve the quality of care.

    Reference

    1. Hyman CS, Liebman CB, Schechter CB, et al. Interest-Based Mediation of Medical Malpractice Lawsuits: A Route to Improved Patient Safety? Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2010;35:797-828.

    Source

    • Carol Liebman, JD, Clinical Professor of Law, Columbia Law School, New York City. Telephone: (212) 854-4291. E-mail: cliebman@law.columbia.edu.

    Post a comment to this article

    Report Abusive Comment

    www.reliasmedia.com

    Healthcare Risk Management

    View PDF
    Healthcare Risk Management 2011-02-01
    February 1, 2011

    Table Of Contents

    TRICARE contracts can bring affirmative action requirements

    Affirmative action includes impact analyses

    Surprise! You might be a federal contractor

    Court ruling: TRICARE not like Medicare

    Volunteers a great asset until they cost you

    Compliance officer hat could take you far

    Mediation effective, but many skeptical

    More than $9 billion recovered from fraud

    Hospital CEO guilty of six felony counts

    Tort reform doesn't alleviate doctors' fear

    Legal Review & Commentary: Alleged Failure to Perform Adequate Follow-Up Care and Investigate Cause of Pain Leads to $500,000 Settlement

    Legal Review & Commentary: Nursing Home Resident Dies After Fall; $900K Verdict

    HIPAA Regulatory Alert: Importance of security risk assessments rise with advent of electronic health records

    HRA: Patient data protection not a top priority

    Pay attention to content of phone messages

    HRA: Meaningful use incentive program dates

    Begin Test
    Buy this Issue/Course

    Shop Now: Search Products

    • Subscription Publications
    • Books & Study Guides
    • Webinars
    • Group & Site
      Licenses
    • State CME/CE
      Requirements

    Webinars And Events

    View All Events

    Free Email Newsletters

    All Fields Required

    E-Newsletter Options
    • Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education
    • American Nurses Credentialing Center
    • American College of Emergency Physician
    • American Board of Internal Medicine: Maintenance of Certification
    • California Board of Registered Nursing
    • Commission for Case Manager Certification
    • American Academy of Pediatrics
    • American Osteopathic Association
    • Home
      • Home
      • Newsletters
      • Blogs
      • Archives
      • CME/CE Map
      • Shop
    • Emergency
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Live Webinars
      • On-Demand Webinars
      • Libraries
    • Hospital
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Live Webinars
      • On-Demand Webinars
      • Libraries
    • Clinical
      • All Products
      • Publications
      • Study Guides
      • Live Webinars
      • On-Demand Webinars
    • All Access
      • Learn More
      • My Subscription
    • My Account
      • My Subscriptions
      • My Content
      • My Orders
      • My CME/CE
      • My Transcript
    • Help
    • Search
    • About Us
    • Sign In
    • Register
    Relias Media - Continuing Medical Education Publishing

    The trusted source for

    healthcare information and

    CONTINUING EDUCATION.

    Customer Service

    customerservice@reliasmedia.com

    U.S. and Canada: 1-800-688-2421

    International +1-404-262-5476

    Accounts Receivable

    1-800-370-9210
    ReliasMedia_AR@reliasmedia.com

    Mailing Address

    • 1010 Sync St., Suite 100
      Morrisville, NC 27560-5468
      USA

    © 2019 Relias. All rights reserved.

    Privacy Policy  Terms of Use  Contact Us  Reprints  Group Sales

    For DSR inquiries or complaints, please reach out to Wes Vaux, Data Privacy Officer, DPO@relias.com

    Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing