The trusted source for
healthcare information and
Louis and Gertrude Feil Professor and Chair, Department of Neurology, Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, NYP/Weill Cornell Medical College
Dr. Fink reports no financial relationships relevant to this field of study.
SOURCE: Kitagawa K, Yamamoto Y, Arima H, et. al, for the Recurrent Stroke Prevention Clinical Outcome (RESPECT) Study Group. Effect of standard vs intensive blood pressure control on the risk of recurrent stroke: A randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:
High blood pressure is the most prevalent and important risk factor for stroke, and great efforts have been made to reduce blood pressure for both primary and secondary stroke prevention. In clinical trials of primary prevention of all cardiovascular events, which includes stroke, lower blood pressure seems to be better in all patients, and a systolic blood pressure of less than 115 mmHg has been recommended as a target. However, after a stroke, there continues to be controversy and debate over the ideal target blood pressure. In this study, the authors randomized 1,280 patients who already had suffered an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke into two blood pressure (BP)treatment arms — standard therapy, defined as BP control with a target less than 140/90 mmHg, and an intensive treatment arm, with a blood pressure target of less than 120/80 mmHg. The primary outcome measure was stroke recurrence.
This study was performed in Japan, and it was stopped early. Of the 1,263 enrolled patients, the mean age was 67.2 years, and 69.4% were male. A total of 99.5% of the patients completed a mean follow-up of 3.9 years, with a mean blood pressure at baseline that was 145.4/83.6 mmHg. In the standard group, throughout the overall follow-up, the mean BP was 133.2/77.7 mmHg. In the intensive treatment group, mean BP was 126.7/77.4 mmHg. When comparing the rate of recurrent stroke between the two groups, there was a nonsignificant rate reduction in the intensive group compared to the standard group. The investigators then pooled their data with findings from three previous randomized, controlled trials in a meta-analysis, and stated that with this larger group, the risk ratio favored intensive BP control (relative risk, 0.78; P = 0.02). The authors concluded that intensive blood pressure lowering tended to reduce stroke recurrence and recommended a target BP that was less than 130/80 mmHg for secondary stroke prevention.
There are problems with the recommendation of the investigators. They excluded patients 85 years of age and older, and this is a large cohort of stroke patients. The authors were only able to show a significant difference by doing a meta-analysis and pooling data from other studies, and this was not part of their initial research plan. They terminated the study early before any firm conclusions could be drawn. At this time, we do not have evidence to support a firm recommendation for optimal blood pressure management for secondary stroke prevention.
Financial Disclosure: Neurology Alert’s Editor in Chief Matthew Fink, MD; Peer Reviewer M. Flint Beal, MD; Editorial Group Manager Leslie Coplin; Editor Jason Schneider; Executive Editor Shelly Morrow Mark; and Accreditations Manager Amy M. Johnson, MSN, RN, CPN, report no financial relationships relevant to this field of study.